Metaview
AI agents that source, screen, and take interview notes alongside your ATS
- Category
- Business & Sales
- Pricing
- Sourcing is self-serve (Free up to 100 profiles, Pro at $100/month/user for 200 profiles, Max at $300/month/user for unlimited), while the full Agentic Recruiting Platform (application review, interview notes, and reporting) is custom-priced and sold through a sales consultation.
- Best for
- Corporate talent acquisition teams, recruiting agencies, and executive search firms that run a high volume of candidate outreach and interviews and want AI assistance layered onto an existing ATS rather than a new system of record.
- Official site
- www.metaview.ai
- Last updated
- August 2026
Metaview positions itself not as a replacement for an applicant tracking system but as an AI-driven operating layer that sits on top of one. Where a traditional ATS is a system of record for tracking candidates through stages, Metaview focuses on the labor-intensive work around those stages: finding candidates, reading through applications, and capturing what actually happened in an interview. It packages this as a set of task-specific agents rather than one monolithic AI feature, which is a meaningful difference from single-purpose tools like interview-notetaking apps or sourcing-only platforms.
In the broader recruiting-tech landscape, Metaview competes at the intersection of interview intelligence tools (which mainly focus on call recording and note synthesis) and AI sourcing platforms (which focus on outbound candidate discovery). By bundling sourcing, application review, interview notes, and reporting under one roof, it's making a bet that recruiting teams would rather consolidate several narrow AI tools into one connected workflow than stitch together separate point solutions. Whether that consolidation is worth it depends heavily on how many of those four functions a given team actually needs automated, since some organizations may only want the interview-notes piece and find the rest redundant with existing tools.
Corporate talent acquisition teams, recruiting agencies, and executive search firms that run a high volume of candidate outreach and interviews and want AI assistance layered onto an existing ATS rather than a new system of record.
Key features
Sourcing agent
An autonomous agent identifies candidates matching a role's requirements and sends outreach messages, aiming to reduce manual searching on platforms like LinkedIn.
Application review
AI screens incoming applications against role criteria and surfaces a ranked shortlist with stated reasoning for each match.
Interview notes
The system joins scheduled video calls (Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, Webex), records them, and generates structured notes and summaries shortly after the call ends.
Recruiting reports
An analytics layer aggregates data across searches and interviews to surface trends such as compensation expectations and candidate signals over time.
Fillmore (autonomous scheduling agent)
A newer agent that finds candidates, reaches out, and schedules screening calls with less manual recruiter involvement.
Human-in-the-loop controls
Metaview markets 'AI orchestration with human guardrails,' including audit trails intended to keep recruiters and hiring managers able to review and override agent actions.
Pricing breakdown
Sourcing – Free
- First 100 sourced profiles free
- Unlimited concurrent searches
- Good for evaluating the sourcing agent
Sourcing – Pro
- 200 sourced profiles per month
- Unlimited concurrent searches
Sourcing – Max
- Unlimited sourced profiles
- Unlimited concurrent searches
Agentic Recruiting Platform
- All agents: sourcing, application review, interview notes, reporting
- Dedicated onboarding and support
- SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PIPEDA compliance features
- Volume and usage tailored to the organization
Pros and cons
Pros
- The four-agent structure means teams can potentially reduce reliance on several separate point tools for sourcing, screening, and note-taking.
- Integration coverage is genuinely broad, spanning over 100 ATS platforms plus the major video, calendar, and SSO providers, which lowers switching friction for teams with an established stack.
- Independent reviewers on G2 rate the product highly (4.8 out of 5 across 132 reviews as of this writing), which is a meaningful signal given the review count.
- The self-serve entry point for sourcing lets a team trial part of the product without going through a sales cycle first.
- Explicit compliance certifications (SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, etc.) are listed up front, which matters for enterprise buyers with procurement requirements.
Cons
- Pricing for the core platform (application review, notes, reports) is not published, so buyers can't compare total cost without engaging sales, unlike the transparent sourcing-only tier.
- Because interview notes require the AI to join and record live calls, teams need their own process for candidate notification and consent, and recording policies vary by jurisdiction.
- The product's value is strongest for teams that want multiple hiring-funnel stages automated together; a team that only needs one function (e.g., just interview notes) may be paying for scope it won't use.
- As with most AI screening and note tools, output quality on application review and note accuracy will vary by role complexity and interview format, and should be spot-checked rather than trusted blindly for high-stakes decisions.
Alternatives to Metaview
Frequently asked questions
How much does Metaview cost?
The sourcing agent has published self-serve pricing (Free, $100/month, or $300/month per user depending on volume), but the full Agentic Recruiting Platform covering application review, interview notes, and reporting is custom-priced and quoted through a sales conversation.
Does Metaview replace our ATS?
No. Metaview is designed to work alongside an existing applicant tracking system rather than replace it, integrating with platforms like Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, and Ashby among more than 100 supported ATS tools.
How does Metaview handle candidate consent and data privacy for recorded interviews?
Metaview joins and records video calls to generate interview notes, so teams are responsible for their own candidate notification and consent process; the company states it holds SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, and PIPEDA compliance, but consent requirements still vary by region and should be confirmed with Metaview's security documentation before rollout.
What's the biggest limitation to know about before buying?
The core platform's pricing isn't public, and the product bundles four distinct functions (sourcing, screening, notes, reporting) together, so teams that only need one of those functions may end up evaluating more scope, and cost, than they actually require.
How does Metaview compare to other interview intelligence or AI sourcing tools?
Most competitors specialize in one function, such as interview-note capture or outbound sourcing alone; Metaview's differentiation is combining sourcing, screening, notes, and reporting into one connected agentic workflow, which suits teams consolidating tools but may be more than a team needing a single point solution wants.
How do teams typically get started with Metaview?
Teams can try the sourcing agent on the free tier without sales involvement, but adopting the full platform (application review, interview notes, reporting) requires a sales consultation to scope pricing and rollout.
Ready to try Metaview?
Head to the official site to explore pricing and start a free trial where available.
Visit Metaview →